Perspectives on training in obstetrics and gynaecology during the COVID-19 pandemic: Thematic analysis of trainee responses from a pan-European survey
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Articles
VOLUME: 15 ISSUE: 3
P: 251 - 258
September 2023

Perspectives on training in obstetrics and gynaecology during the COVID-19 pandemic: Thematic analysis of trainee responses from a pan-European survey

Facts Views Vis ObGyn 2023;15(3):251-258
1. Tommy’s National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
2. Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan, The Hague, The Netherlands
3. Kackar State Hospital, Pazar, Rize, Turkey
4. Gynecologic Oncology Department, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
5. Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, Portugal
6. College of Medical and Dental Sciences. University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
No information available.
No information available
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Background

Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has affected many aspects of the lives of medical professionals. Postgraduate training has also been affected and mitigation plans are still ongoing.

Objective

To understand the perspectives of trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology (ObGyn) during the pandemic.

Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional exploratory survey conducted electronically from 20th of April 2020 to 1st July 2020.

Main outcomes measures

The original questionnaire comprised of 40 questions and a free-text option. The free-text questions covered five main domains: effect of the pandemic on training, worries about training, acquisition of skills during the pandemic, training period and extensions and responsibilities outside training during the pandemic. The responses to these questions in the survey were analysed using pragmatic thematic analysis.

Results

Trainees felt there was lack of training as well as training opportunities. Some took the pandemic as an opportunity to gain new skills. Trainees were also worried about time in training and uncertainty about extensions. Lastly, many had concerns pertaining to patient care, an inability to contribute to departmental organisation, and dissatisfaction with the implemented policies.

Conclusion

The difficulties in Obstetrics and gynaecology training due to the pandemic need to be mitigated. When planning for reshaping the training programmes to accommodate for the discrepancies caused, trainers need to consider the perspectives of trainees and actively involve them in the decision making, designing and executing future plans.

What is new? Efforts are currently underway to address the training time lost during the pandemic in Europe. Recognising the paramount importance of providing exceptional care for women and children across the continent, it becomes imperative to consider the valuable perspectives and insights offered by those who represent the future generation of specialists in the field.

Keywords:
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Postgraduate training, medical education, COVID-19, ENTOG, trainees