Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version?
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Articles
VOLUME: 15 ISSUE: 3
P: 225 - 234
September 2023

Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version?

Facts Views Vis ObGyn 2023;15(3):225-234
1. Centre for Endometriosis and Minimally Invasive Gynaecology (CEMIG London), HCA The Lister Hospital, Chelsea Bridge Road, London, United Kingdom, SW1W 8RH
2. Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, United Kingdom, TW20 0EX
3. Ashford and St. Peter’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Guildford Road, Chertsey, United Kingdom, KT16 0PZ
4. Poole Hospital NHS Trust, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Longfleet Road, Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom, BH15 2JB
5. Princess Anne Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Coxford Road, Southampton, United Kingdom, SO16 5YA
6. University of Surrey, Postgraduate Medical School, Daphne Jackson Road, Manor Park, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7WG
No information available.
No information available
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Background

Anonymized videotaped endoscopic procedures can be used for the assessment of surgical competence, but a reliable non-procedure-specific scoring system is needed for gynaecology.

Objectives

To design and evaluate the validity of the Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System (GLVS), a novel tool in the assessment of various gynaecological laparoscopic procedures.

Materials and methods

Seventeen anonymized unedited video recordings of various gynaecological laparoscopic procedures and the 4-minute-long edited versions of the same videos were independently scored by two experts, twice, using GLVS.

Main outcome measures

Internal consistency reliability, test-retest, and inter-rater reliability of GLVS. We also compared the scored achieved by edited videos with those of the full-length version of the same videos.

Results

The mean score achieved by 4-minute-long edited videos was similar to that of the unedited version (p= 0.13 - 0.19). There was excellent correlation between the pooled scores for edited and unedited versions (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.86). GLVS had excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha 0.92-0.97). Test-retest and inter-rater reliability were generally better for edited 4-minute-long videos compared to their full-length version. Test-retest reliability for edited videos was excellent for scorer 1 and good for scorer 2 with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.88 and 0.62 respectively. Inter-rater reliability was good for edited videos (ICC=0.64) but poor for full-length versions (ICC= -0.24).

Conclusion

GLVS allows for objective surgical skills assessment using anonymized shortened self-edited videos  of basic gynaecological laparoscopic procedures. Shortened video clips of procedures seem to be representative  of their full-length version for the assessment of surgical skills.

What’s new? We devised and undertook a validation study for a novel tool to assess surgical skills using surgical video clips. We believe this addition clearly delineates the unique contributions of our study.

Keywords:
Assessment tool, laparoscopic skills