Facts, Views & Vision
in ObGyn

Journal of the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy

esge_logo

Intravesical misplacement of vaginal contraceptive ring: a video report and review of the literature

G. Panico1, G. Campagna2, S. Mastrovito1, D. Arrigo1, D. Caramazza1, G. Scambia1,3, A. Ercoli4

1 Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
2 Precision Gynaecological Surgery Unit, Dipartimento Centro di Eccellenza Donna e Bambino Nascente, Fatebenefratelli Gemelli Isola Tiberina, 00186 Rome, Italy
3 Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
4 Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Human Pathology of Adults and Developmental Age, University Hospital “G. Martino”, 98100 Messina, Italy

Keywords:

NuvaRing®, contraceptive vaginal ring, intravesical foreign body, cystoscopy


Published online: Jun 28 2024

https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.16.2.016

Abstract

Background: The NuvaRing®, a hormonal vaginal contraceptive device, has gained widespread usage due to its favourable efficacy and safety profiles. Exceedingly rare instances of unintended misplacement in the bladder have been reported. This study presents a review of the literature and the first video report illustrating the extraction of an intravesical NuvaRing®, discussing diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Objective: To illustrate an effective method for intravesical NuvaRing® retrieval and raise awareness about this unusual complication.

Materials and Methods: A 27-year-old patient with low urinary tract symptoms related to NuvaRing® misplacement underwent diagnostic procedures, including ultrasound and diagnostic cystoscopy. A cystoscopic extraction under general anaesthesia was performed.

Main Outcome Measures: The effectiveness of pelvic ultrasound for diagnosing an intravesical foreign body, successful cystoscopic removal of NuvaRing® from the bladder, and symptom resolution were assessed.

Results: The intravesical NuvaRing® was identified through pelvic ultrasound. During cystoscopy, the ring was detected inside the bladder. Multiple attempts with cystoscopic alligator graspers were made; the NuvaRing® was eventually extracted using transurethral Heiss forceps. The patient experienced minimal blood loss and was discharged the following day, reporting relief from symptoms.

Conclusions: Unintentional NuvaRing® placement in the bladder is an extremely rare event that healthcare providers should consider when patients present with urinary symptoms and pelvic pain. Pelvic ultrasound is an efficient diagnostic tool, possibly averting the need for further imaging techniques. Cystoscopy remains the preferred method for diagnosis and treatment. This video report illustrates an effective technique for NuvaRing ® extraction, especially when appropriate graspers are unavailable. Adequate instruction on NuvaRing® insertion should always be emphasised.

Video scan (read QR)

https://vimeo.com/928718982/04c518bbb2