Live birth rate per transfer is not impacted by the proportion of smooth endoplasmatic reticulum
aggregates oocytes
ICSI, live birth rate, smooth endoplasmatic reticulum aggregates, SERa
Published online: Jun 30 2023
Abstract
Background: Despite the data published to date, prognostic factors and the clinical impact of ICSI cycles with smooth endoplasmatic reticulum aggregates (SERa) positive oocytes remain unclear.
Objective: Are the clinical outcomes of an ICSI cycle impacted by the proportion of oocytes with SERa?
Materials and Methods: Retrospective study (2016-2019), including data from 2468 ovum pick-ups, performed in a tertiary university hospital. Cases are categorised based on the rate of SERa positive oocytes compared to the total number of MII oocytes: 0% (n=2097), <30% (n=262) and ≥30% (n=109).
Main outcome measures: Patient characteristics, cycle characteristics and clinical outcomes are compared between the groups.
Results: Compared to SERa negative cycles, women with ≥30% SERa positive oocytes are older (36.2y vs. 34.5y, p<0.001), have lower anti-mullerian hormone levels (AMH) (1.6ng/ml vs. 2.3ng/ml, p<0.001), have received more gonadotropins (3227U vs. 2858IU, p=0.003), have a lower number of good quality day 5 blastocysts (1.2 vs. 2.3, p<0.001) and face more blastocyst transfer cancellation (47.7 vs. 23.7%, p<0.001). Women with <30% SERa positive oocytes are younger (33.8y, p=0.04), have higher AMH levels (2.6ng/ml, p<0.001), have more oocytes retrieved (15.1, p<0.001), have a higher number of good quality day 5 blastocysts (3.2, p<0.001) and have less transfer cancellations (14.9%, p<0.001) compared to SERa negative cycles A multivariate analysis shows no significant difference in cycle outcomes between the categories.
What is new? Treatment cycles with ≥30% SERa positive oocytes are less likely to result in an embryo transfer when only non-SER oocytes are used. However, live birth rate per transfer is not affected by the proportion of SERa positive oocytes.
