Journal of the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy

esge_logo

V-NOTES hysterectomy under spinal anaesthesia: A pilot study

E.C. Gündoğdu1, E. Mat2, Y. Aboalhasan3, G. Yıldız1, G. Başol1, K. Tolga Saraçoğlu4, G. Arslan4, A. Kale1

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Science Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
2 Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Science Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Siirt Training and Research Hospital, Siirt, Turkey
4 Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Science Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Keywords:

Hysterectomy, Laparoscopy, Spinal anaesthesia, V-NOTES


Published online: Sep 30 2022

https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.14.3.040

Abstract

Background: Spinal anaesthesia has not been widely adopted for laparoscopic surgeries until now. There are a few studies that have shown that spinal anaesthesia is at least as safe as general anaesthesia. The need for additional analgesics can be reduced by utilising early postoperative analgesic effects of spinal anaesthesia, and maximum benefit can be obtained from minimally invasive approaches when V-NOTES surgery is performed under spinal anaesthesia.

Objective: Combining V-NOTES with spinal anaesthesia to improve minimally invasive surgical techniques and provide maximum benefit to patients.

Materials and methods: Patients who were found to have benign pelvic organ pathologies, required a hysterectomy and were considered suitable for V-NOTES hysterectomy under spinal anaesthesia were included in this study. Spinal anaesthesia was achieved with 12.5 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in the sitting position. Perioperative events and complications related to spinal anaesthesia were noted. Postoperatively, the pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale at the 6th, 12th, and 24th hours.

Main outcome measures: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of spinal anaesthesia in VNOTES hysterectomy and to increase the advantages of minimally invasive surgical procedures. Results: No conversion to conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy was required in all six operated patients. Conversion from spinal anaesthesia to general anaesthesia was unnecessary, and no major perioperative incident occurred in any of the cases.

Conclusion: In the current study by our team, we demonstrated that V-NOTES hysterectomy could be performed safely under spinal anaesthesia in well-selected patients. The need for additional analgesics can be reduced by utilising early postoperative analgesic effects of spinal anaesthesia, and maximum benefit can be obtained from minimally invasive approaches when VNOTES surgery is performed under spinal anaesthesia.

What is new? V-NOTES hysterectomy could be performed safely under spinal anaesthesia in well-selected patients.